Who's REALLY “Turning Back the Clocks” on Women’s Rights?

Who is really “turning back the clocks” on women’s rights?

Feminism was originally about equality, justice, and getting the government out of the way. Today’s feminism is not about women’s empowerment, it is about being a “certain” type of woman. The kind of woman who is wiling to give up religious freedom and relinquish her life to the state.
A liberal woman. There is no other, apparently.
Women like MSNBC Political Analyst Karen Finney. Regarding Santorum’s wins on Super Tuesday, she cannot comprehend why women would vote for a conservative:
“This woman vote really hurts me, I got to say. You heard me say that…It’s a little painful because I’m wondering if those women really heard the full message that, yes, there’s the economy, but if you’ve got to worry about your basic healthcare, how are you then going to be able to do what you need to do in terms of having a job, paying your rent, taking care of your kids?”
She is stunned that we could be so stupid. She implies that we think economic issues are more important than what she sees is a “health care” issue. Wrong, sweetheart. Most women just see that forcing Catholic institutions to pay for your birth control is a “freedom of religion” issue.
Hillary Clinton is that “certain” kind of woman, too:
“Why extremists always focus on women remains a mystery to me. But they all seem to. It doesn‘t matter what country they’re in or what religion they claim. They all want to control women.”
Because women do vote conservative, and Hillary knows this, she is saying that women are extremists who want to control women. Makes no sense, right?
Senator Bernard Sanders uses this seemingly inclusive and universal word, “women,” as well:
"If the Senate had 83 women and 17 men instead of 83 men and 17 women, my strong guess is a bill like this would never make it to the floor," he said, referring to the Republican amendment to circumvent a rule requiring employers to provide contraceptives.
Don’t put me in a box, Bernie. You don’t speak for me. You don’t speak for women. You speak for the minority. You speak for the Liberal Woman.
Then Nancy Pelosi really blew it.
"Five men are testifying on women's health," she said. "Where are the women? Imagine having a panel on women's health and they don't have any women on the panel."
She paused, and then added, "Duh!"
Apparently she was, um…mistaken.
Congressman Darrell Issa’s spokeswoman Becca Glover Watkins stated, "Rep. Pelosi is either ill informed or arrogantly dismissive of women who don’t share her views. Today’s hearing does in fact include two women, Dr. Allison Garrett of Oklahoma Christian University and Dr. Laura Champion of Calvin College Health Services," she said.
DUH, back atchya, Nancy.
Women literally don’t count unless they are liberals. They may as well not even exist.
It’s simple, “ladies” and “gentleman:”
We real women don’t want the government to pay our rent. We don’t want the government to provide us with a job or give us free birth control. We want the government to get the Hell out of our lives. We do not consider ourselves a weak sub-species that needs to be taken care of. We do not drink the kool-aid of the Pelosis and Clintons and Finneys. We’d rather be like Susan B. Anthony:
“There is not the woman born who desires to eat the bread of dependence, no matter whether it be from the hand of father, husband, or brother; for any one who does so eat her bread places herself in the power of the person from whom she takes it. Independence is happiness.”
The only “women” who are turning back the clock on women’s rights are the unhappy, dependent, and liberal ones.